Pojem fyzicka osoba neni totozna s clovekem - Diskuze a zkušenosti

Uz se dlouho zabyvam s pojmem fyzicka osoba. Jelikoz umim vyborne anglicky ktery mi je blizsi nez cesky casto studuji v AJ. Nyni jsem opet narazil na pojem ktery se mi nelibil; "your legal personality" Neco ve smyslu "tvoje pravnicka osobnost" Coze? Moje pravnicka osobnost? A kdo mi ji vytvoril? Vim ze fyzicka osoba neni nutne clovek, v zakone se mj. pise: "§ 19(1) Každý člověk má vrozená, již samotným rozumem a citem poznatelná přirozená práva, a tudíž se považuje za osobu. Zákon stanoví jen meze uplatňování přirozených práv člověka a způsob jejich ochrany."Tady neni ani rec o mozne ekvivalence..A jeste horsi: "§ 17(1) Práva může mít a vykonávat jen osoba. Povinnost lze uložit jen osobě a jen vůči ní lze plnění povinnosti vymáhat." Tady neni rec o lidech ani o zviratech..http://business.center.cz/business/… je Google translate stale nedokonaly ale presto stoji to za to, zejmene umite dobre anglicky!https://translate.google.com//…%20Comments%0A%0A%20%0APrintFriendly%20a%20PDF%20Print%20Friendly%20or%20Save%20as%20PDF%0AIdentita%0A%0ABy%20Ken%20Bartle%0A%0AGuest%20Writer%20for%20Wake%20Up%20World%0A%0ASuppose%20that%20the%20word%20‘person’%20(by%20definition)%20has%20been%20misconstrued%20in%20meaning.%20Suppose%20that%20in%20our%20society%2C%20a%20‘person’%20is%20a%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%2C%20a%20thing%2C%20an%20artificial%20construct%20and%20not%20a%20‘living%20being’.%20Suppose%20that%20you%20are%20blissfully%20ignorant%20of%20this%20deception%2C%20and%20truly%20believe%20that%20you%20are%20a%20“person”%20.%0A%0AWhat%20if%20your%20government%20considers%20a%20‘person’%20to%20be%20a%20corporate%20entity%3F%20And%20what%20if%2C%20without%20your%20knowledge%20or%20consent%2C%20you%20are%20legally%20responsible%20for%20a%20corporate%20entity%20that%20bears%20your%20name%3F%20And%20as%20a%20consequence%20you%20are%20bound%20by%20rules%20and%20laws%20that%20were%20meant%20to%20govern%20commerce%2C%20not%20people%3F%0A%0AWhat%20ill%20consequences%20might%20arise%20from%20your%20ignorance%3F%20And%20who%20might%20benefit%20from%20this%20misunderstanding%3F%20Let”s%20look.%0A%0ASo%20what%20is%20a%20person%3F%20Is%20a%20“person”%20a%20‘thing’%2C%20is%20it%20a%20legal%20entity%2C%20or%20is%20it%20a%20‘living%20being’%3F%20That%20needs%20to%20be%20clear.%0A%0AThis%20article%20pursues%20the%20concept%20of%20the%20‘person’%20and%20exposes%20our%20system%20of%20‘identification’%20as%20a%20most%20damnable%20and%20contemptuous%20crime.%0A%0A%0A%0A%20%0A“I’m%20that%20person”%0A%0AImagine%20you%20arrive%20at%20the%20front%20desk%20of%20your%20local%20government%20office%20and%20you’re%20asked%20if%20you%20have%20any%20personal%20ID.%20“Yes%2C%20no%20problem”%20you%20say%2C%20as%20you%20flash%20your%20photo%20ID%20card%20or%20passport%20saying%2C%20“I’m%20the%20person”%20.%0A%0ASuppose%20a%20‘person’%20is%20actually%20a%20LEGAL%20ENTITY.%20Haven’t%20you%20just%20and%20agreed%20to%20act%20on%20behalf%20of%20that%20‘artificial%20person’%20in%20your%20capacity%20as%20a%20‘living%20being’%3F%20Haven’t%20you%20have%20just%20agreed%20to%20continue%20the%20deception%3F%20And%20since%20you%20consented%20to%20this%20monstrous%20deception%2C%20would%20it%20shock%20you%20that%20corporatised%20‘governments’%20use%20that%20consent%20to%20treat%20you%20as%20a%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%2C%20an%20artificial%20‘person’%2C%20in%20all%20that%20it%20does%20and%20in%20every%20court%20in%20the%20country%3F%20Does%20it%20shock%20you%20that%20‘government’%20demands%20every%20self-serving%20compliance%20it%20can%20get%20away%20with%3F%20That%20it%20owns%20your%20drivers%20licence%2C%20your%20passport%2C%20your%20birth%20certificate%2C%20your%20kids%2C%20your%20education%2C%20their%20education%2C%20your%20health%2C%20your%20property%20title%2C%20your%20car%3F%0A%0AAnd%20how%20would%20you%20feel%20to%20learn%20that%20every%20time%20you%20use%20the%20word%20‘person’%2C%20you%20endorse%20a%20criminally%20deceptive%20legal%20perversion%20that%20underpins%20the%20most%20heinous%20crime%20in%20human%20history%3B%20the%20theft%20of%20your%20life%2C%20your%20identity%2C%20your%20freedom%2C%20and%20that%20of%20your%20family%20and%20friends%3F%0A%0AWhat%20is%20a%20“person”%3F%0A%0AOxford%20Dictionary%20defines%20‘identification’%20as%3A%0A%0A“a%20means%20of%20proving%20a%20person’s%20identity%2C%20especially%20in%20the%20form%20of%20official%20papers”.%20%5Bemphasis%20added%5D%0A%0AGoogle%20provides%20a%20multitude%20of%20answers%20to%20the%20question%20–%20“original%20meaning%20of%20person%3F”%20My%20trusty%20Mac%20summed%20all%20of%20them%20succinctly.%0A%0AORIGIN%20Middle%20English%3A%20from%20Old%20French%20‘persone’%2C%20from%20Latin%20persona%2C%20“actor’s%20mask%2C%20character%20in%20a%20play’%2C%20later%20‘human%20being’.”%0A%0ALet’s%20go%20right%20back%20to%20its%20Latin%20origins%20–%20persona%2C%20actor’s%20mask%2C%20character%20in%20a%20play.%20The%20word%20‘person’%20denotes%20a%20mask%2C%20a%20presumed%20character%2C%20a%20concealment%20of%20sorts%2C%20something%20under%20the%20covers%20that%20only%20deliberate%20inquiry%20may%20reveal.%0A%0ASo%20what%20might%20the%20word%20‘person’%20be%20hiding%3F%0A%0ALet’s%20start%20by%20defining%20the%20legal%20meaning%20of%20the%20word%20‘person’.%20There%20are%20two%20persons%20identified%20in%20law%3A%20these%20are%20“natural-person”%20and%20“artificial-person”.%0A%0ANatural%20persons%0A%0ALet’s%20try%20to%20define%20“Natural%20person”%20.%20Several%20definitions%20emerge%20from%20Google%3A%0A%0Aa%20human%20being%2C%20naturally%20born%2C%20versus%20a%20legally%20generated%20juridical%20person.%0A‘natural%20person’%20refers%20to%20a%20human%20being%20as%20opposed%20to%20a%20legally-created%20entity%2C%20like%20a%20Corporation%2C%20Limited%20Liability%20Company%2C%20General%20Partnership%2C%20Limited%20Partnership%2C%20etc.%0AA%20natural%20person%20is%20any%20human%20being%2C%20with%20legal%20capacity%20commencing%20from%20the%20time%20of%20birth.%0AA%20living%2C%20breathing%20human%20being%2C%20as%20opposed%20to%20a%20legal%20entity%20such%20as%20a%20corporation.%0AA%20living%20human%20being.%20Legal%20systems%20can%20attach%20rights%20and%20duties%20to%20natural%20persons%20without%20their%20express%20consent%20.%0AAll%20resources%20agree%20on%20“human%20being”%20%2C%20but%20there%20seems%20far%20too%20much%20divergence%20of%20opinion%20to%20clearly%20define%20‘natural%20person’.%20Qualifiers%20and%20dis-qualifiers%20abound%3B%20none%20are%20definitive.%0A%0AFurther%20research%20brought%20the%20website%20natural-person.ca%20into%20focus%2C%20particularly%20because%20it%20offers%20some%20words%20of%20caution.%0A%0ATwo%20key%20words%20that%20are%20re-defined%20in%20almost%20every%20Statute%20are%20the%20words%20“person”%20and%20“individual”.%20There%20are%20only%20two%20“persons”%20in%20law%2C%20a%20human%20being%2C%20and%20everything%20else%3A%20a%20natural-person%20is%20a%20legal%20entity%20for%20the%20human-being.%20An%20artificial-person%20is%20a%20legal%20entity%20that%20is%20not%20a%20human%20being.%0ADid%20you%20spot%20it%3F%0A%0AIn%20almost%20every%20Statute”%20%2C%20there%20are%20two%20types%20of%20“persons”%20%2C%20and%20both%20are%20legal%20entities%3B%20one%20for%20the%20living%20being%2C%20and%20one%20not%20a%20living%20being.%20But%20did%20you%20notice%20it%20does%20not%20say%20that%20a%20‘natural-person’%20is%20legally%20“OF”%20the%20living%20being%2C%20but%20is%20an%20entity%20“FOR”%20the%20living%20being%3F%20Is%20it%20logical%20that%20if%20the%20“natural-person”%20is%20a%20‘legal%20entity’%20FOR%20a%20living%20human%2C%20then%20“natural-person”%20has%20no%20humanity%20to%20it.%20(E.g.%20a%20door%20FOR%20a%20shed%20is%20a%20door%3B%20it%20cannot%20also%20be%20a%20shed.)%0A%0AWhatever%20happened%20to%20the%20“breathing”%20%3F%20What%20happened%20to%20all%20that%20flesh%20and%20blood%3F%0A%0AWell%2C%20according%20to%20your%20LEGAL%20status%2C%20flesh%20and%20blood%20doesn’t%20exist.%20The%20definition%20of%20the%20phrase%20“natural-person”%20does%20not%20include%20the%20living%20being’s%20“Life%20characteristics”%20%3B%20those%20‘life’%20elements%20which%20prove%20life%20is%20present%2C%20have%20been%20disqualified.%20A%20“natural-person”%20is%20something%20constructed%20to%20serve%20a%20human%20being%2C%20and%20so%20must%20be%20some%20‘thing’%20other%20than%20human.%20It%20does%20not%20live.%20This%20“natural-person”%20is%20dependent%20for%20all%20its%20actions%20upon%20a%20living%2C%20breathing%20human%20being.%0A%0ADoes%20this%20surprise%20you%3F%20And%20would%20it%20surprise%20you%20to%20know%20you%20were%20not%20supposed%20to%20notice%20this%20distinction…%20like%20it%20is%20masked%20in%20legality%20and%20deceit%3F%0A%0APerson%20or%20human%3F%0A%0ALet’s%20examine%20this%20idea.%0A%0AThere%20are%20only%20two%20“persons”%20in%20law%2C%20a%20human%20being%2C%20and%20everything%20else.%20Sounds%20simple%20enough.%20What’s%20to%20explain%20further%3F%0A%0AEvery%20human%20being%20is%20considered%20by%20the%20legal%20system%20to%20be%20a%20“person”%20.%20You%20are%20a%20member%20of%20the%20(legal)%20“person”%20club%2C%20and%20as%20an%20unknowing%20member%20of%20that%20club%2C%20a%20“natural-person”%20entity%20has%20been%20created%20for%20you.%20It%20hides%20under%20the%20mask%20of%20“person”%20and%2C%20deceptively%2C%20shares%20your%20name.%20And%20if%20you%20accept%20your%20‘membership’%20by%20flashing%20your%20ID%20card%2C%20you%20are%20accepting%20and%20confirming%20that%20you%20are%20an%20artificial%20person%20.%0A%0AArtificial%20persons%0A%0AThe%20word%20‘artificial’%20means%20made%20or%20produced%20by%20human%20beings%20rather%20than%20occurring%20naturally%2C%20typically%20as%20a%20copy%20of%20something%20natural.%20So%20an%20‘artificial%20person’%20is%20seemingly%20a%20man%20made%20copy%20–%20but%20of%20what%3F%0A%0AAn%20artificial%20person%20is%20a%20legal%20entity%20that%20is%20not%20a%20human%20being%2C%20but%20for%20certain%20legal%20purposes%20is%20considered%20by%20virtue%20of%20statute%20to%20be%20a%20natural%20person.%0A%0AIs%20your%20understanding%20complete%20yet%2C%20or%20is%20the%20wolf%20still%20circling%3F%0A%0AGovernment%20created%20an%20artificial%20thing%20that%20is%20non-human%2C%20a%20Legal%20Entity%2C%20and%20labelled%20it%20an%20‘artificial%20person’.%20Government%20statutes%20also%20create%20a%20‘natural%20person’%20entity%2C%20which%20enables%20the%20‘living%20being’%20to%20act%20for%20the%20‘artificial%20person’%20–%20and%20be%20bound%20by%20rules%20applicable%20only%20to%20‘artificial%20persons’.%0A%0ASo%20what%20does%20this%20mean%3F%0A%0AMost%20people%20will%20accept%20that%20there%20is%20something%20about%20“government”%20that%20doesn’t%20feel%20right%3B%20that%20our%20current%20social%20structure%20doesn’t%20really%20benefit%20us%2C%20or%20our%20ailing%20environment.%20In%20a%20world%20of%20beauty%20and%20abundance%2C%20we%20work%20unreasonably%20long%20hours%20in%20concrete%20cities%2C%20foregoing%20our%20own%20desires%2C%20to%20barely%20scrape%20by.%20Why%3F%20To%20fit%20into%20a%20system%20of%20controls%20that%20existed%20long%20before%20each%20of%20us%20was%20born.%0A%0ABut%20think%20about%20it.%20If%20“the%20system”%20doesn’t%20benefit%20you%2C%20who%20does%20it%20ultimately%20benefit%3F%20It%20must%20work%20to%20someone’s%20advantage.%20It’s%20just%20not%20you!%0A%0AAnd%20now%20we’re%20starting%20to%20understand%20how%20this%20all%20came%20to%20pass.%0A%0AGovernment%20is%20not%20stupid.%20It%20recognised%20that%20a%20real%2C%20live%20human-being%20was%20an%20indispensable%20factor%20in%20activating%20this%20legal%20entity%2C%20to%20give%20it%20“life”%20and%20activity….%20i.e.%20to%20open%20envelopes%2C%20vote%20to%20uphold%20government%2C%20write%20letters%2C%20pay%20on%20demand%2C%20get%20the%20kids%20vaccinated%2C%20attend%20court%2C%20apply%20for%20a%20license%2C%20pay%20registration%20fees%2C%20pay%20the%20extortion%20fee%20(fine)%20for%20parking%20longer%20than%2060%20minutes%20—%20all%20so%20that%20government%20could%20make%20money%20from%20your%20existence.%20Which%20it%20inevitably%20does.%0A%0ASurprised%3F%20Don’t%20be.%20Government%20is%20a%20corporation%20after%20all!%0A%0ABut%20how%20many%20people%20really%20know%20and%20understand%20that%20what%20we%20consider%20“government’%20is%20not%20real%20government%2C%20that%20it%20only%20masquerades%20as%20such%3F%20They’ve%20hidden%20this%20fact%20well%2C%20and%20for%20a%20very%20long%20time.%0A%0ASo%20what%20else%20have%20governments%20hidden%3F%20You’ve%20guessed%20haven’t%20you%3F%20Persons.%0A%0AGovernment%20recognised%20that%20it%20needed%20to%20mask%20this%20‘person’%20scam%20and%20keep%20it%20from%20public%20view.%20Otherwise%2C%20who%20would%20play%20along%3F%20Without%20your%20agreement%20(albeit%20by%20deceit)%20to%20play%20along%2C%20to%20represent%20the%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%2C%20government%20knows%20it%20cannot%20exercise%20control%20over%20your%20being.%20Government%20knows%20that%20it%20cannot%20legitimately%20exercise%20authority%20over%20living%20beings%2C%20as%20it%20is%20itself%20the%20creation%20of%20living%20beings.%20In%20the%20natural%20hierarchy%2C%20human%20trumps%20institution%20every%20day%20of%20the%20week.%0A%0ASo%2C%20to%20facilitate%20its%20system%20of%20control%2C%20government%20went%20back%20to%20Latin….%20and%20presto!%20There%20was%20the%20word%20persona%20–%20a%20mask.%20The%20word%20fitted%20its%20purpose%20to%20perfection!%20And%20by%20misconstruing%20its%20meaning%20in%20common%20usage%2C%20living%20breathing%20human%20beings%20unknowingly%20accept%20the%20obligations%20imposed%20by%20law%20on%20the%20Legal%20entities%20created%20in%20our%20names.%0A%0AThe%20definition%20of%20‘person’%20now%20makes%20perfect%20sense%2C%20doesn’t%20it%3F%20An%20‘actor’s%20mask’%2C%20a%20‘character%20in%20a%20play’.%20And%20what%20better%20mask%20than%20to%20have%20a%20“Natural%20Person”%20act%20as%20a%20bridge%20to%20the%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%20–%20the%20“artificial%20person”%20%3F%20Better%20yet%2C%20why%20not%20put%20the%20‘natural%20person’%20(an%20entity%20created%20“for”%20the%20living%20being)%20in%20the%20same%20court%20(pun%20intended)%20with%20the%20non-living%20‘artificial’%20person%2C%20so%20that%20Lawyers%20can%20put%20more%20knots%20in%20the%20corporate%20noose%20that%20today%20has%20us%20all%20hanging%20by%20our%20necks%3F%0A%0ABy%20skilfully%20using%20the%20word%20“person”%20for%20both%20entities%2C%20government%20has%20hidden%20the%20mask%20right%20under%20your%20nose.%20We%20have%20been%20led%20to%20believe%20that%20a%20“person”%20is%20a%20human%20being%20–%20full%20stop.%20So%20we%20accept%20the%20legal%20ownership%20of%20the%20“person”%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%20(created%20by%20government)%20and%20in%20the%20process%20forego%20our%20basic%20human%20rights%20to%20the%20will%20of%20government.%0A%0ABlack’s%20Law%20Fictionary%20Dictionary%20(9th%20Ed.)%20says%20this%20about%20“Artificial%20Persons”%20%3A%0A%0AArtificial%20person.%20(17c)%20An%20entity%2C%20such%20as%20a%20corporation%2C%20created%20by%20law%20and%20given%20certain%20legal%20rights%20and%20duties%20of%20a%20human%20being%3B%20a%20being%2C%20real%20or%20imaginary%2C%20who%20for%20the%20purpose%20of%20legal%20reasoning%20is%20treated%20more%20or%20less%20as%20a%20human%20being%20….%20–%20Also%20termed%20fictitious%20person%3B%20juristic%20person%3B%20juridical%20person%3B%20legal%20person%3B%20moral%20person.%20Cf.%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%0A%0APersons%2C%20persons%2C%20persons!%20Read%20it%20again.%20Pause%20on%20every%20phrase.%20Let%20every%20one%20sink%20in.%0A%0AIs%20your%20‘person’%20a%20“legal%20entity”%20that%20bleeds%20you%20of%20every%20life%20characteristic%20you%20possess%2C%20a%20lifeless%20entity%20that%20will%20be%20treated%20as%20“more%20or%20less”%20human%3F%20And%20if%20‘persons’%20are%20“given%20certain%20legal%20rights%20and%20duties”%2C%20then%20do%20‘persons’%20also%20have%20unalienable%20rights%20–%20rights%20that%20do%20not%20depend%20on%20government%20granting%20or%20withdrawing%20them%3F%20You%20would%20have%20to%20think%20not%2C%20surely.%0A%0APersonally%20speaking….%0A%0AWikipedia%20asserts%20that%20the%20purpose%20of%20identification%20(ID)%20is%20to%20“verify%20aspects%20of%20a%20person’s%20personal%20identity”%20%2C%20and%20there%20aren’t%20many%20who%20would%20disagree%20with%20that%20definition.%20Now%20consider….%0A%0AWhen%20a%20person%2C%20who%20does%20not%20understand%20what%20‘person’%20actually%20means%2C%20hands%20over%20their%20personal%20ID%20to%20another%20person%2C%20they%20give%20up%20their%20persona%20and%20becomes%20the%20‘person’%20behind%20the%20mask.%20They%20assume%20the%20role%20of%20the%20LEGAL%20ENTITY%20‘person’%2C%20a%20mask%20they%20believe%20is%20their%20real%20human%20person.%0A%0AUse%20of%20the%20word%20‘person’%20on%20a%20daily%20basis%20is%20almost%20impossible%20to%20escape.%20It%20is%20so%20ingrained%20into%20our%20language%2C%20our%20conversations%2C%20even%20our%20news%20reports.%0A%0AFor%20example%2C%20“two%20witnesses%20reported%20a%20young%20person%20departing%20at%20high%20speed”.%0A%0AWitness%20definition%3F%20A%20person%20who%20sees%20an%20event%2C%20typically%20a%20crime%20or%20accident%2C%20take%20place.%0A%0AAnother%20example%2C%20“many%20were%20horribly%20shocked%2C%20some%20bystanders%20needing%20psychological%20counselling”.%0A%0ABystander%20definition%3F%20A%20person%20who%20is%20present%20at%20an%20event%20or%20incident%20but%20does%20not%20take%20part.%0A%0AAnother%20example%2C%20“the%20defendant%20appeared%20in%20court%20in%20person”.%0A%0AThe%20labels%20and%20roles%20we%20are%20attributed%20in%20our%20society%20all%20invariably%20point%20back%20to%20the%20word%20‘person’%20which%2C%20as%20we%20know%2C%20is%20a%20LEGAL%20ENTITY.%0A%0ACollectively%20speaking….%0A%0A‘People’%20is%20a%20collective%20word.%20‘Persons’%20is%20also%20a%20collective%20word.%20So%20what%20is%20the%20difference%3F%0A%0AAccording%20to%20OxfordDictionaries.com%20%3A%0A%0AThe%20words%20people%20and%20persons%20can%20both%20be%20used%20as%20the%20plural%20of%20person%2C%20but%20they%20are%20not%20used%20in%20exactly%20the%20same%20way.%0A%0APeople%20is%20by%20far%20the%20more%20common%20of%20the%20two%20words%20and%20is%20used%20in%20most%20ordinary%20contexts%3A%20a%20group%20of%20people%20%3A%20there%20were%20only%20about%20ten%20people%20%3A%20several%20thousand%20people%20have%20been%20rehoused.%0A%0APersons%2C%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20tends%20now%20to%20be%20restricted%20to%20official%20or%20formal%20contexts%2C%20as%20in%20%3A%20this%20vehicle%20is%20authorized%20to%20carry%20twenty%20persons%20%3A%20no%20persons%20admitted%20without%20a%20pass.%0A%0ADid%20you%20catch%20that%20one%3F%20Observe%20that%20“a%20group%20of%20people”%20%2C%20“about%2010%20people”%20%2C%20“several%20thousand%20people”%20describes%20living%2C%20flesh-and-blood%20human%20beings.%0A%0A‘Persons’%2C%20conversely%2C%20is%20a%20quantity%20of%20individuals%20to%20be%20ruled%2C%20to%20be%20restricted%2C%20to%20be%20governed%2C%20to%20be%20“authorized”%20%2C%20to%20be%20(or%20not%20to%20be)%20“admitted%20without%20a%20pass”%20.%0A%0AAs%20the%20linguistic%20context%20switched%20from%20‘people’%20to%20‘persons’%2C%20so%20too%20the%20social%20context%20switched%20from%20‘not%20ruled’%20to%20‘ruled’.%0A%0APersonalism%0A%0ATwists%20and%20turns%20permeate%20the%20topic%20of%20the%20‘person’%2C%20as%20all%20the%20above%20indicates.%20if%20you%20really%20want%20to%20get%20to%20the%20bottom%20of%20a%20‘person’%20(excuse%20the%20pun%20–%20I%20did%20not%20mean%20to%20be%20personal!)%20a%20thorough%20and%20comprehensive%20article%20entitled%20‘%20Personalism’%2C%20from%20The%20Stanford%20Encyclopedia%20of%20Philosophy%201%20is%20essential%20(but%20not%20easy)%20reading.%0A%0AThe%20term%20‘person’%20comes%20from%20the%20Latin%20persona%2C%20whose%20origins%20are%20traceable%20to%20Greek%20drama%2C%20where%20the%20%3F%3F%3F%3F%3F%3F%3F%3F%2C%20or%20mask%2C%20became%20identified%20with%20the%20role%20an%20actor%20would%20assume%20in%20a%20given%20production.%20Such%20usage%20is%20carried%20over%20today%20in%20the%20word%20“persona%2C”%20referring%20to%20characters%20in%20fictional%20literature%20or%20drama%2C%20or%20second%20identities%20which%20people%20adopt%20for%20behavior%20in%20given%20social%20contexts.%0A%0AIts%20introduction%20into%20the%20mainstream%20of%20intellectual%20parlance%2C%20however%2C%20came%20with%20theological%20discourse%20during%20the%20patristic%20period%2C%20notably%20the%20attempts%20to%20clarify%20or%20define%20central%20truths%20of%20the%20Christian%20faith.%20These%20discussions%20focused%20primarily%20on%20two%20doctrines%3A%20the%20Trinity%20(three%20“persons”%20in%20one%20God)%20and%20the%20incarnation%20of%20the%20second%20person%20of%20the%20Trinity%20(the%20“hypostatic”%20union%20of%20two%20natures%20–%20divine%20and%20human%20–%20in%20one%20“person”%20).%0A%0ANotice%20the%20bold%20portions.%20Are%20you%20seeing%20a%20trend%20here%3F%20Throughout%20the%20patristic%20period%2C%20the%20word%20‘person’%20was%20cultivated%20to%20denote%20separation%2C%20or%20multiple%20identities.%0A%0AIn%20a%20later%20paragraph%20it%20is%20described%20as%20an%3A%0A%0A…%20elusive%20concept%20which%20in%20some%20respects%20wholly%20inverts%20the%20original%20connotations%20of%20exteriority%20in%20the%20early%20meanings%20of%20“mask”%20and%20“role”%20%3A%20person%20comes%20rather%20to%20denote%20the%20innermost%20spiritual%20and%20most%20authentic%20kernel%20of%20the%20unique%20individual.%0A%0AObserve%20how%20the%20(innermost%20spiritual)%20persona%20is%20seen%20to%20be%20an%20element%20within%20the%20‘person’%2C%20as%20though%20separate%20from%20the%20individual%3B%20as%20though%20the%20persona%20has%20an%20assumed%20(greater)%20importance.%0A%0ADignity%0A%0AKeep%20reading%20Personalism%20%2C%20and%20after%20describing%20the%20Eastern%2C%20European%20and%20American%20influences%20and%20histories%20of%20“personalism”%20%2C%20the%20real%20message%20begins%20to%20emerge….%0A%0ADignity%20refers%20to%20the%20inherent%20value%20of%20the%20person%2C%20as%20a%20“someone”%20and%20not%20merely%20“something%2C”%20and%20this%20confers%20an%20absoluteness%20not%20found%20in%20other%20beings.%0A%0ADon’t%20run%20away%20yet%20–%20there’s%20a%20tiger%20lurking%20here.%20Consider%20this….%0A%0AIf%20dignity%20is%20the%20inherent%20value%20of%20the%20person%2C%20then%20self-respect%2C%20pride%2C%20self-esteem%20and%20self-worth%20are%20human%20attributes%20that%20transform%20“something”%20into%20“someone”%20.%20The%20“absoluteness%20of%20those%20attributes%20are%20not%20found%20in%20other%20beings”%20.%20Join%20the%20dots%20and%20human%20dignity%20is%20what%20makes%20a%20person%2C%20agreed%3F%0A%0ABut%20what%20are%20these%20“other%20beings”%20that%20do%20not%20have%20dignity%20and%20do%20not%20therefore%20qualify%20as%20persons%3F%20Are%20they%20animals%3F%20Let’s%20look%20further.%0A%0AIn%20stressing%20the%20uniqueness%20of%20persons%20vis-à%20-vis%20all%20other%20entities%2C%20personalists%20influenced%20by%20Thomism%20(Thomas%20Aquinas)%20designate%20the%20essential%20dividing%20line%20of%20reality%20as%20that%20which%20separates%20personal%20and%20non-personal%20being.%0A%0ANow%20we’re%20getting%20closer!%20Does%20a%20“non-personal%20being”%20suggest%20an%20artificial-person%3F%0A%0AHere%20classical-realist%20personalists%20reject%20the%20Hobbesian%20(Thomas%20Hobbes)%20notion%20of%20dignity%20as%20the%20price%20set%20on%20an%20individual%20by%20the%20commonwealth%20%2C%20and%20ally%20themselves%20rather%20with%20Kant%20(Emanuel%20Kant)%20in%20his%20assertion%20that%20dignity%20is%20inherent%20and%20sets%20itself%20beyond%20all%20price.%20(Emphasis%20mine)%0A%0AApparently%20there’s%20division%20in%20the%20ranks.%20It%20seems%20that%20(notional)%20“dignity”%20was%20once%20considered%20the%20“price%20set%20on%20an%20individual%20by%20the%20commonwealth”%20%2C%20but%20German%20philosopher%20Immanuel%20Kant%20(22%20April%201724%20–%2012%20February%201804)%20asserted%20that%20dignity%20is%20beyond%20all%20price%2C%20because%20it%20is%20inherent.%0A%0ASounds%20like%20Kant%20knew%20his%20stuff!%20Is%20there%20a%20change%20in%20tone%20here%2C%20as%20first%20seems%20to%20be%20the%20case%3F%20Or%20did%20Kant%20realize%20that%20if%20you%20want%20to%20disguise%20a%20non-living%20being%20as%20a%20living%20being%20you’d%20damn%20well%20better%20give%20both%20dignity%20or%20you’ve%20blown%20your%20cover%3F%0A%0AThe%20mask%0A%0AContinuing%20from%20The%20Stanford%20Encyclopedia%20of%20Philosophy%20%2C%20Swiss%20theologian%20Hans%20Urs%20presented%20the%20following%20viewpoint%3A%0A%0AVon%20Balthasar%2C%20for%20example%2C%20wrote%3A%20“Few%20words%20have%20as%20many%20layers%20of%20meaning%20as%20person%20.%20On%20the%20surface%20it%20means%20just%20any%20human%20being%2C%20any%20countable%20individual.%20Its%20deeper%20senses%2C%20however%2C%20point%20to%20the%20individual’s%20uniqueness%20which%20cannot%20be%20interchanged%20and%20therefore%20cannot%20be%20counted.”%20In%20this%20deeper%20sense%20persons%20cannot%2C%20properly%20speaking%2C%20be%20counted%2C%20because%20a%20single%20person%20is%20not%20merely%20one%20in%20a%20series….%20and%20thus%20exchangeable%20for%20any%20other.%0A%0AVon%20Balthasar%20goes%20on%20to%20say%3A%20“If%20one%20distinguishes%20between%20‘individual’%20and%20‘person’%20(and%20we%20should%20for%20the%20sake%20of%20clarity)%2C%20then%20a%20special%20dignity%20is%20ascribed%20to%20the%20person%20%2C%20which%20the%20individual%20as%20such%20does%20not%20possess….%20We%20will%20speak%20of%20a%20‘person’…%20when%20considering%20the%20uniqueness%2C%20the%20incomparability%20and%20therefore%20irreplaceability%20of%20the%20individual.%20(Emphasis%20mine)%0A%0ABut%20it%20seems%20Kantian%20psychology%20won%20the%20day.%0A%0AIn%20an%20article%20entitled%20“Causality%20Versus%20Duty”%20%2C%20novelist%20and%20philosopher%20Ayn%20Rand%20wrote….%0A%0AIf%20“genius”%20denotes%20extraordinary%20ability%2C%20then%20Kant%20may%20be%20called%20a%20genius%20in%20his%20capacity%20to%20sense%2C%20play%20on%20and%20perpetuate%20human%20fears%2C%20irrationalities%20and%2C%20above%20all%2C%20ignorance.%20His%20influence%20rests%20not%20on%20philosophical%20but%20on%20psychological%20factors.%0A%0AFurther%20demonstrating%20her%20point%2C%20Rand%20also%20wrote….%0A%0AKant%20originated%20the%20technique%20required%20to%20sell%20irrational%20notions%20to%20the%20men%20of%20a%20skeptical%2C%20cynical%20age%20who%20have%20formally%20rejected%20mysticism%20without%20grasping%20the%20rudiments%20of%20rationality.%0A%0AThe%20technique%20is%20as%20follows%3A%20if%20you%20want%20to%20propagate%20an%20outrageously%20evil%20idea%20(based%20on%20traditionally%20accepted%20doctrines)%2C%20your%20conclusion%20must%20be%20brazenly%20clear%2C%20but%20your%20proof%20unintelligible.%20Your%20proof%20must%20be%20so%20tangled%20a%20mess%20that%20it%20will%20paralyze%20a%20reader’s%20critical%20faculty%20–%20a%20mess%20of%20evasions%2C%20equivocations%2C%20obfuscations%2C%20circumlocutions%2C%20non%20sequiturs%2C%20endless%20sentences%20leading%20nowhere%2C%20irrelevant%20side%20issues%2C%20clauses%2C%20sub-clauses%20and%20subsub-clauses%2C%20a%20meticulously%20lengthy%20proving%20of%20the%20obvious%2C%20and%20big%20chunks%20of%20the%20arbitrary%20thrown%20in%20as%20self-evident%2C%20erudite%20references%20to%20sciences%2C%20to%20pseudo-sciences%2C%20to%20the%20never-to-be-sciences%2C%20to%20the%20untraceable%20and%20the%20unprovable%20–%20all%20of%20it%20resting%20on%20a%20zero%3A%20the%20absence%20of%20definitions.%0A%0AWhat%20greater%20evil%3F%0A%0ALet’s%20examine%20Rand’s%20reference%20to%20“propagating%20an%20outrageously%20evil%20idea”%20.%20Which%20of%20the%20following%20would%20be%20the%20greater%20evil%3F%0A%0A1.%20To%20propagate%20an%20outrageously%20evil%20idea%3F%20Or….%0A%0A2.%20To%20give%20an%20existing%20evil%20idea%20the%20face%20of%20acceptability%20so%20thoroughly%20and%20uniformly%20that%20no%20one%20would%20ever%20recognise%20its%20evil%20nature%20or%20purpose%3F%0A%0AHow%20would%20you%20achieve%20what%20question%202%20proposes%3F%20How%20would%20you%20whitewash%20an%20evil%20idea%20thoroughly%3F%0A%0AThere%20are%20no%20prizes%20for%20the%20correct%20answer%3B%20you’d%20dispel%20the%20notion%20that%20the%20idea%20was%20evil%20in%20the%20first%20place%3B%20make%20it%20acceptable%2C%20normalise%20it%2C%20gloss%20it%20over%2C%20change%20the%20words%20so%20it%20means%20something%20different%2C%20even%20remove%20the%20words%20entirely.%20And%2C%20because%20this%20must%20be%20done%20thoroughly%20and%20uniformly%2C%20you’d%20hit%20the%20most%20receptive%20nerves%20possible%20through%20the%20most%20common%20resources%20at%20your%20disposal.%0A%0AScrubbing%20scripture%0A%0AFor%20clues%2C%20let’s%20look%20back%20through%20history%2C%20before%20the%20times%20of%20the%20many%20philosophers%20mentioned%20in%20the%20Stamford%20University%20article%2C%20specifically%20to%20the%20Wycliffe%20Bible%20(1380)%20(by%20LAMP%20POST%20Inc.%202008)%0A%0A1.%20James%202%20v9%3A%0A%0ABut%20if%20ye%20taken%20persones%2C%20ye%20worchen%20synne%2C%20and%20ben%20repreued%20of%20the%20lawe%2C%20as%20trespasseris.%0A%0A2.%20Romans%202%20v11%0A%0AFor%20acceptioun%20of%20persones%20is%20not%20anentis%20God.%0A%0A3.%20Acts%2010%20v34%0A%0AAnd%20Petre%20openyde%20his%20mouth%2C%20and%20seide%2C%20In%20trewthe%20Y%20haue%20foundun%2C%20that%20God%20is%20no%20acceptor%20of%20persones%3B%0A%0ANow%20this%20was%20written%20is%20in%201380.%20There%20was%20no%20TV%20and%20no%20internet%20in%20those%20days.%20No%20emails%2C%20faxes%20or%20even%20Gestetner%20duplicating%20machines.%20“WTF%20is%20a%20typewriter..”%20it%20might%20be%20asked%2C%20“much%20less%20a%20Biro%3F”%0A%0ABut%20there%20were%20philosophers%2C%20the%20practice%20of%20which%20examines%20the%20fundamental%20aspects%20of%20the%20nature%20of%20existence%2C%20to%20provide%20man%20with%20a%20comprehensive%20view%20of%20life%20that%20serves%20as%20a%20base%20and%20frame%20of%20reference%20for%20all%20his%20actions%2C%20mental%20or%20physical%2C%20psychological%20or%20existential.%0A%0AEven%20without%20a%20detailed%20language%20translation%2C%20it%20is%20very%20clear%20from%20the%201380%20biblical%20quotations%20above%20that%20‘persons’%20was%20not%20an%20acceptable%20idea%20to%20God%2C%20to%20say%20least.%20“God%20is%20no%20acceptor%20of%20persones”%20and%20“acceptioun%20of%20persones”%20is%20“synne”.%0A%0APhilosopher’s%20disagreed.%20Immanuel%20Kant%2C%20and%20others%20proceeding%20him%2C%20decided%20that%20“persones”%20should%20be%20granted%20dignity%2C%20even%20at%20the%20expense%20of%20individuals%20–%20of%20living%20human%20beings.%0A%0ASurely%20that%20conflicts%20with%20the%20scriptures%20quoted%20above!%20Did%20these%20dudes%20turn%20the%20tables%2C%20psychologically%20and%20philosophically%3F%20Did%20they%20give%20an%20existing%20evil%20idea%20the%20face%20of%20acceptability%20so%20thoroughly%20and%20uniformly%20that%20no%20one%20would%20ever%20recognise%20its%20outrageously%20evil%20nature%20or%20purpose%3F%0A%0ALet’s%20look%20at%20more%20evidence….%0A%0ALet’s%20take%20the%20exact%20same%20references%20as%20above%20–%20this%20time%20from%20the%20(King%20James%20Bible)%20KJB%20printed%20by%20Hodder%20%26%20Stoughton%20for%20the%20International%20Bible%20Society%20NIV%20©%20edition%201995.%0A%0A1.%20James%202%20v9%3A%0A%0ABut%20if%20you%20show%20favouritism%2C%20you%20sin%20and%20are%20convicted%20by%20the%20law%20as%20law%20breakers.%0A%0A2.%20Romans%202%20v11%20%0A%0AFor%20God%20does%20not%20show%20favouritism.%20%0A%0A3.%20Acts%2010%20v34%0A%0AThen%20Peter%20began%20to%20speak%3A%20“I%20now%20realise%20how%20true%20it%20is%20that%20God%20does%20not%20show%20favouritism…”%0A%0ANow%20Compare%20the%201380%20quotations%20with%20their%201995%20equivalents.%20Three%20times%20the%20word%20‘person’%20has%20been%20removed.%20Three%20times%20the%20word%20‘favouritism’%20has%20been%20substituted.%0A%0ALet’s%20explore%20this%20idea%20further….%20%0A%0AFirst%2C%20God%20declares%20‘persons’%20to%20be%20sinners%20and%20unacceptable%3B%20adopting%20a%20‘person’%2C%20or%20‘a%20presumed%20character’%2C%20it%20is%20an%20act%20of%20‘concealment’.%0A%0A625%20years%20later%2C%20God%20apparently%20has%20second%20thoughts.%20‘Favoritism’%20is%20now%20the%20sin%2C%20and%20‘persons’%20are%20now%20unclassifiable%2C%20equally%20acceptable%20with%20all%20others%2C%20and%20absolved%20from%20sin.%20The%20evil%20of%20‘persons’%20that%20God%20first%20warned%20of%20has%2C%20miraculously%2C%20completely%20vanished.%20Now%20your%20life%2C%20your%20‘dignity’%2C%20your%20“inherent%20value”%20that%20defines%20you%20as%20a%20“someone%20and%20not%20merely%20something”%20%2C%20all%20means%20naught%20—%20because%20“God%20does%20not%20show%20favouritism”%20.%0A%0AHow%20clever%20is%20that%3F%20And%20how%20morally%20and%20criminally%20reprehensible%3F%20%0A%0AToday%2C%20despite%20what%20God%20may%20have%20said%20in%20the%20past%2C%20‘artificial%20persons’%20are%20considered%20completely%20acceptable%20because%20favouritism%20is%20the%20new%20sin.%20So%20too%20are%20natural-persons%2C%20juristic%20persons%2C%20juridical%20persons%2C%20legal%20persons%2C%20moral%20persons%20and%20even%20LEGAL%20ENTITIES.%0A%0ASo….%20who%20are%20you%3F%0A%0AWhen%20you%20interact%20with%20government%20and%20the%20law%2C%20will%20you%20be%20treated%20as%20an%20‘artificial%20person’%2C%20a%20‘natural%20person’%2C%20or%20your%20real%20living%20breathing%20self%3F%0A%0ADo%20you%20do%20governments’%20bidding%3F%20Do%20you%20comply%20with%20their%20every%20statute%20and%20law%3F%20DO%20you%20suffer%20every%20rule%20and%20regulation%3F%20Agree%20to%20every%20financial%20impediment%20and%20our%20constant%20state%20of%20debt%3F%20Accept%20every%20act%20of%20corporate%20back-scratching%20and%20profitable%20environmental%20irresponsibility%3F%20And%20bow%20to%20a%20state%20of%20tyranny%20and%20militaristic%20terror%3F%0A%0AHow%20many%20millions%20of%20us%20listen%20up%2C%20sit%20up%2C%20pay%20up%20and%20shut%20up….%20then%20teach%20our%20children%20that%20government%20is%20for%20their%20personal%20protection%20and%20benefit%3F%0A%0AWhy%20do%20we%20religiously%20believe%20we%20must%20carry%20a%20small%20card%20to%20validate%20our%20existence%2C%20when%20offering%20that%20ID%20constitutes%20nothing%20more%20than%20agreeing%20(with%20government)%20that%20you%20will%20act%20as%20some%20“thing”%20you%20are%20not%3F%0A%0AWhy%20do%20thousands%20cry%20tears%20of%20blood%20every%20week%20when%20stripped%20of%20their%20ID%20or%20driver’s%20licence%2C%20when%20that%20card%20has%20really%20belonged%20to%2C%20and%20defined%2C%20an%20‘artificial%20person’%20from%20day%20one%3F%0A%0AHave%20you%20been%20beguiled%20to%20believe%20the%20‘artificial%20person’%2C%20which%20government%20so%20cleverly%20masked%20in%20word%20play%2C%20is%20you%3F%0A%0ADo%20you%20understand%20the%20criminality%20of%20stripping%20you%20of%20your%20‘life%20characteristics’%2C%20or%20the%20inverted%20morality%20involved%20in%20such%20a%20scheme%3F%0A%0AAre%20you%20a%20flesh-and-blood%2C%20thinking%2C%20living%20being%3F%20Or%20an%20‘artificial%20person’%20that%20your%20ID%20endorses%20every%20time%20you%20present%20it%3F%0A%0AYour%20consent%0A%0AWhere%2C%20on%20any%20ID%20card%20you%20have%20ever%20seen%20it%20stated%2C%20written%20or%20encoded%20that%20you%20are%20a%20living%20being%2C%20to%20the%20exclusion%20of%20all%20others%3F%0A%0AYou%20haven’t.%20And%20do%20you%20see%20why%20not%3F%20If%20others%20are%20not%20expressly%20excluded%20then%20legal%20entities%2C%20natural%20and%20artificial%20persons%2C%20can%20also%20be%20identified%20in%20the%20same%20way.%0A%0AAs%20a%20card-carrying%20‘person’%2C%20you%20are%20considered%20no%20different%20to%20a%20‘natural’%20or%20‘artificial%20person’.%20You%20have%20the%20same%20rights%20as%20a%20corporation.%20Every%20time%20you%20offer%20up%20your%20ID%20card%2C%20you%20grant%20government%20your%20consent%20to%20this%20arrangement.%20Every%20time%20you%20open%20an%20envelope%20addressed%20to%20someone%20that%20you%20think%20is%20you%2C%20but%20is%20really%20the%20‘person’%20that%20shares%20your%20name%2C%20you%20grant%20government%20your%20consent%20to%20be%20that%20‘person’-%20and%20to%20be%20treated%20accordingly.%0A%0AGoodbye%20inalienable%20rights%2C%20hello%20dictates%20of%20government!%0A%0AYour%20consent%20to%20be%20treated%20as%20a%20‘person’%20is%20all%20Government%20wants%20from%20you.%20And%2C%20by%20these%20methods%20and%20many%20more%2C%20you%20submit%20to%20all%20their%20statutes%2C%20laws%2C%20thievery%20and%20corruption%20–%20all%20because%20you%20have%20been%20taught%20that%20your%20ID%20is%20really%20you.%0A%0AWhat%20does%20your%20‘official’%20ID%20card%20actually%20prove%3F%20It’s%20not%20proof%20of%20your%20true%20identity%20that%20government%20wants.%20What%20they%20want%20from%20you%20is%20your%20agreement%20to%20act%20as%20the%20‘person’%20they%20created.%0A%0ARemember%20the%20phrase%20“%20Consent%20of%20the%20Governed%20”%20%3F%20Is%20its%20real%20meaning%20clearer%20now%3F%0A%0AYou%20hold%20the%20key%0A%0ADespite%20all%20the%20lies%2C%20masks%2C%20obfuscations%2C%20falsifications%2C%20artificialities%2C%20political%20constructs%20and%20bloody-minded%20corruption%20(revealed%20over%20centuries)%2C%20what%20still%20remains%20untainted%20and%20unblemished%3F%20What%20stands%20head%20and%20shoulders%20above%20all%20else%20–%20simple%2C%20pure%2C%20honest%20and%20without%20reproach%3F%0A%0AYou.%20The%20fact%20that%20you%20live.%0A%0ASome%20feel%20incompetent%20to%20run%20their%20own%20lives%2C%20yet%20feel%20supremely%20competent%20to%20run%20the%20lives%20of%20others.%20Government%20are%20incompetent%20dependents%20on%20one%20hand%2C%20yet%20belligerently%20skilful%20manipulators%20on%20the%20other.%0A%0ABy%20nature%2C%20government%20is%20dependent.%20Your%20life%2C%20every%20breath%20that%20you%20take%2C%20is%20the%20life%20force%20on%20which%20they%20depend.%20Your%20life%20is%20their%20power%2C%20the%20only%20power%20they%20have.%20They%20give%20you%20an%20ID%2C%20as%20though%20you%20never%20had%20life%20before%20they%20granted%20it.%20They%20made%20a%20‘natural%20person’%20entity%20in%20your%20name%2C%20which%20ensures%20you%20interact%20appropriately%20with%20the%20legal%20and%20economic%20systems%20they%20have%20created%20around%20you.%20By%20exercising%20whatever%20force%20they%20consider%20necessary%2C%20they%20use%20this%20entity%20to%20strip%20you%20bare%20of%20the%20very%20life%20force%20they%20depend%20on.%0A%0ABut%20that%20entity%20is%20not%20you.%20It%20is%20a%20mask%2C%20and%20its%20name%20admits%20that%20fact.%0A%0AReclaiming%20you%20“ID”%0A%0AGet%20a%20life%3F%20NO!%20You%20have%20it%20already.%0A%0ATake%20back%20your%20life%20force.%20Grasp%20hold%20of%20those%20characteristics%20that%20clearly%20and%20unmistakably%20prove%20you%20are%20a%20unique%20expression%20of%20your%20creator.%20Take%20charge%20of%20those%20“life%20characteristics”%20as%20a%20breathing%2C%20flesh%20and%20blood%20human%20being.%20Identify%20those%20characteristics.%20Claim%20them.%20They%20belong%20to%20you.%0A%0AForget%20the%20“Birth%20Certificate”%20BS.%20That’s%20one%20of%20their%20masking%20filters%2C%20a%20document%20used%20by%20government%20to%20create%20the%20‘natural%20person’.%20A%20Birth%20Certificate%20only%20proves%20that%20“thing”%20of%20theirs%20got%20“birthed”%20.%20But%20that%20thing%20is%20NOT%20you!%20You%20were%20“born”%20.%0A%0AMan%20is%20an%20indivisible%20entity%20of%20matter%20and%20consciousness%2C%20and%20that%20each%20human%20being%20has%20the%20sovereign%20right%20to%20their%20own%20life%20and%20to%20that%20which%20is%20required%20to%20sustain%20it.%20It%20is%20now%20time%20to%20correct%20the%20injustice%20of%20Corporate%20government.%20Their%20days%20are%20numbered….%20In%20peaceful%20defiance%2C%20we%20will%20stop%20consenting%20to%20act%20on%20behalf%20of%20these%20false%20entities%2C%20created%20by%20government%20for%20its%20own%20benefit.%20%0A%0A©%20Ken%20Bartle%20Jan%202014%0A%0AReferences%3A%0A%0A1%20Williams%2C%20Thomas%20D.%20and%20Bengtsson%2C%20Jan%20Olof%2C%20“%20Personalism%20“%2C%20The%20Stanford%20Encyclopedia%20of%20Philosophy%20(Winter%202013%20Edition)%2C%20Edward%20N.%20Zalta%20(ed.)%0A%0AAbout%20the%20author%3A%0A%0AKen%20Bartle%20A%2030%20year%20pioneer%20of%20‘solar%20house’%20design%20in%20Australia%2C%20Ken%20has%20worked%20alongside%20Australia’s%20top%20architects%2C%20researched%20planned%20housing%20development%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20authored%204%20professional%20publications.%20He%20has%20amassed%2016%20state%2C%20national%20and%20international%20awards%2C%20and%20delivered%20a%20paper%20to%20the%20World%20Renewable%20Energy%20Congress%20in%202007.%0A%0AExposure%20to%20building%20contracts%20and%20Land%20Planning%20regulations%20gave%20him%20a%20firm%20grasp%20of%20legal%20documentation%2C%20so%20when%20his%20son%20Scott%20first%20embarked%20on%20his%20expose%20of%20corrupt%20government%20in%20Australia%20%2C%20the%20pieces%20quickly%20fell%20into%20place%20for%20Ken.%20Aided%20by%20over%2035%20years%20study%20of%20Objectivist%20philosophy%2C%20the%20practical%20and%20moral%20nature%20of%20our%20corrupted%20‘government’%20system%20soon%20became%20clear.%0A%0AWhen%20plunder%20becomes%20a%20way%20of%20life%20for%20a%20group%20of%20men%20living%20together%20in%20society%2C%20they%20create%20for%20themselves%20in%20the%20course%20of%20time%20a%20legal%20system%20that%20authorizes%20it%20and%20a%20moral%20code%20that%20glorifies%20it.%20~%20Frederick%20Bastiat%201850%0A%0AKen%20believes%20man%20is%20an%20indivisible%20entity%20of%20matter%20and%20consciousness%2C%20absent%20of%20limits%2C%20and%20that%20each%20human%20being%20has%20the%20sovereign%20right%20to%20their%20own%20life%20and%20that%20which%20is%20required%20to%20sustain%20it.%20And%20today%2C%20grounded%20in%20both%20legal%20and%20philosophical%20understandings%2C%20Ken’s%20work%20is%20to%20help%20correct%20the%20injustice%20and%20remove%20the%20limitations%20of%20corporate%20government.%0A%0ALearn%20more%20at%20AbsentLimits.net%0A%0AThis%20article%20edited%20by%20Andy%20Whiteley%20for%20Wake%20Up%20World%20.